From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 02:41:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8830416A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:41:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8869C43D39 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 9223 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2005 02:36:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 02:36:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 16501 invoked by uid 89); 14 Feb 2005 02:44:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 02:44:56 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE0B1158B; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 04:41:10 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 04:41:09 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: dspam-users@nuclearelephant.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, dspam-dev@nuclearelephant.com Message-ID: <20050214044109.270db658@it.buh.tecnik93.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Need testers] dspam-devel-3.4.b2 on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:41:13 -0000 Hi, If you hope to run the dspam port post 3.3.4 on FreeBSD you are very interested in this email. Note that I didn't test on 4.x because I don't have anymore any 4.x and that I'm in general interested in 4.x feedback On 5.x I don't intend to do anything to support systems under 5.3.(which is the first production release for 5.x) except integrating patches in the port. (And it is my opinion that that anyone still running 5.3-RELEASE should update to -STABLE). Useful suggestion received from / time and work invested by: Brian Fundakowski Feldman , "Daniel S. Haischt" , "Jonathan A.Zdziarski" Get and untar the port: cd /usr/ports/mail/ && \ fetch http://people.tecnik93.com/~itetcu/FreeBSD/ports/dspam-devel/port/dspam-devel-3.4.b2.20050208.1530.tar.gz && \ tar xf dspam-devel-3.4.b2.20050208.1530.tar.gz && \ cd dspam.my make -DWITH_DAEMON -DGDBS <...OTHER_OPTIONS...> you need a least WITH_MYSQL* or WITH_POSTGRESQL for --daemon to work. DON'T install. If you have a dspam --daemon running either stop it or edit your /usr/local/etc/dspam.conf and: - if running on TCP edit ServerPort and ClientPort and set them to something other that 24 - else change ServerDomainSocketPath to /var/run/dspam-test.sock As long as you don't signal or restart your installed dspam there's no problem. When done testing don't forget to change them back. cd ./work/dspam-cvs-devel.20050208.1530/src/ ./dspam --daemon --debug In an other console: cd ./usr/ports/mail/dspam.my/work/dspam-cvs-devel.20050208.1530/src/ && \ ./dspamc --user ....... --proccess --stdout < /path/to/email See what output you get and if the daemon still runs. If yes, send me the output of uname -a and your CFLAGS; and continue testing to confirm it works; something like this should be enough: sh -c 'for I in `ls /path/to/many/emails/dir/*` ; do cat ${I} | ./dspamc --user itetcu --mode=tum --features=ch,no,wh,tb=4 --proccess --stdout & done' If not, send me the output of uname -a, your CFLAGS, the signal with which dspam --daemon dies and any other useful info. You might want to run dspam from gdb, valgrind or better helgrind. If you get to sending patches, please use unified diff (diff -u). Thanks, IOnut /* Hoping to receive at least once feedback from those who ask for updates. > date Mon Feb 14 04:35:21 EET 2005 */