From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug  1 08:45:26 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED9316A4DF;
	Tue,  1 Aug 2006 08:45:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from regnauld@catpipe.net)
Received: from moof.catpipe.net (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8553B43D46;
	Tue,  1 Aug 2006 08:45:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from regnauld@catpipe.net)
Received: from localhost (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130])
	by localhost.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AC8216343B7; Tue,  1 Aug 2006 10:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from moof.catpipe.net ([195.249.214.130])
	by localhost (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 19674-08; Tue,  1 Aug 2006 10:45:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from vinyl.catpipe.net (vinyl.catpipe.net [195.249.214.189])
	by moof.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B922163439E; Tue,  1 Aug 2006 10:45:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by vinyl.catpipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1006)
	id 768F378C31; Tue,  1 Aug 2006 10:40:53 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:40:53 +0200
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@catpipe.net>
To: Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org>, Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>,
	freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20060801084053.GE22731@catpipe.net>
References: <20060628103238.GA815@genius.tao.org.uk>
	<20060628103949.GJ2005@catpipe.net>
	<3aaaa3a0606281940k63c77ebfga84a854b2cd4ed84@mail.gmail.com>
	<20060801084156.GD3440@genius.tao.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060801084156.GD3440@genius.tao.org.uk>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE i386
Organization: catpipe Systems ApS
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at catpipe.net
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Can I pursuade someone to commit this patch? (Re: Multiple IP
	addresses in a jail.)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:45:26 -0000

Josef Karthauser (joe) writes:
> Dear current folk, I'm forwarding this thread from the -net list where I
> asked the question, is it possible to have more than one IP address in a
> jail?  The answer is yes, with Pawel's patch.  The question here is can
> I pursuade anyone to commit this to head and MFC it please?  The
> motivation is simple.  I need to run a second SSL web server inside of a
> jail, however that needs another IP address because SSL is incompatible
> with HTTP/1.1.

	We have been using these patches all the way back since 5-CURRENT and
	they work very stable for us.  I seem to remember that there were
	some reservations about the way it was being done, but for that matter
	it wouldn't be the first hack in jail (like u_int32_t for the ip_number
	in struct jail :)