From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 01:10:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76AB16A4B3 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4A043F85 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:10:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h9L8A6DK092813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:10:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id h9L8A5sd092812; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:10:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:10:05 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Michael Lee(HINET)" Message-ID: <20031021081005.GB92274@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "Michael Lee(HINET)" , Kent Stewart , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000b01c396de$b3f9bb20$ca00a8c0@michael> <20031020081821.GD15500@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <200310200156.50405.kstewart@owt.com> <005701c396ec$fdad30e0$ca00a8c0@michael> <20031020100420.GA17405@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <008501c39780$2c73f1f0$ca00a8c0@michael> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JWEK1jqKZ6MHAcjA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008501c39780$2c73f1f0$ca00a8c0@michael> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kent Stewart Subject: Re: not updating XFree86 related stuff while performing portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:10:19 -0000 --JWEK1jqKZ6MHAcjA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:05:22AM +0800, Michael Lee(HINET) wrote: > There is one thing that I am not sure of. I read again an article in Free= BSD > Diary > http://www.freebsddiary.org/portupgrade.php > and it said that if I force it to pkg_delete a certain package that other > packages depend on, > there might be problems of broken dependencies. Ah -- that is true, unless you immediately replace the deleted package with an equivalent alternative as I instructed. Subsequently running 'pkgdb -Fvu' will help you fix up any remaining dependency problems. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --JWEK1jqKZ6MHAcjA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/lOnddtESqEQa7a0RAlkfAJ40Q/fUx01EAhOc/kP7SgZdOVwBuACffWgz RmOwLo+QXPy59t6rvc9EQ5U= =EdbM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JWEK1jqKZ6MHAcjA--