From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Dec 12 09:22:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA05565
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 09:22:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from db2server.voga.com.br (db2server.voga.com.br [200.239.39.7])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA05530
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 09:21:38 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from daniel_sobral@voga.com.br)
From: daniel_sobral@voga.com.br
Received: from papagaio.voga.com.br (papagaio.voga.com.br [200.239.39.2])
	by db2server.voga.com.br (8.8.3+2.6Wbeta9/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA10120
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 14:21:29 -0300
Received: by papagaio.voga.com.br(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.06 (346.7 3-18-1997))  id 0325656B.005F5840 ; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 14:21:25 -0300
X-Lotus-FromDomain: VOGA
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <8325656B.005F3DB8.00@papagaio.voga.com.br>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 14:21:20 -0300
Subject: Re: Why so many steps to build new kernel?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


I don't think name/class/description is enough. We ought to identify
prerequisites and mutual exclusions (see syscon and vt drivers for an
example of both situations).