From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 8 18:51:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7767216A4DD for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEC943D7C for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:51:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g2so384782nfe for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:51:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Mk6s946rUl/YrW5yK09Ep7SwUjwtwQm9+C7vmqe/lyR5NgcyHC/gItzOl2wq7AEAMF/yX/6Zcvu0oZjZQ5Iw0M/0bXkHnxK232VZTXa3lMSltOjW1tCeTxym1fczNnAr3XpzTMQODG+8zVUJSROeu8oz9usETKPJNsHYJNwRBXg= Received: by 10.78.185.7 with SMTP id i7mr2888537huf; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.185.3 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72cf361e0608081151p68feb6b2lf8badd518cf46a9c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:51:28 +0100 From: "Martin Hepworth" To: Freminlins In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Atom Powers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large File System? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:51:43 -0000 On 8/8/06, Freminlins wrote: > > > The single most important thing missing for me in FreeBSD is a journalling > file system as I would use it on every box. > > Softupdates are the FreeBSD equivalent. From my point of view they perform better than a traditional journaling FS (do a google search for the original usenix papers on these). I also find they speed up I/O quite alot, esp for fast changing filesystems like mail spools. -- martin