From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 14:57:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C1596B; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3774391; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D13DA104; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9351B5540; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:57:31 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: svn commit: r273417 - head References: <201410212029.s9LKThT2074337@svn.freebsd.org> <86d29k28wh.fsf@nine.des.no> <22788EC4-3BDF-40F3-ACAC-FA686ED21154@bsdimp.com> <86iojco2oh.fsf@nine.des.no> <6287010D-9C54-4167-9784-84134080A419@bsdimp.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:57:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <6287010D-9C54-4167-9784-84134080A419@bsdimp.com> (Warner Losh's message of "Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:02:49 -0600") Message-ID: <86mw8ocftw.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:57:45 -0000 Warner Losh writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > I would prefer calling this MK_ATF than MK_TESTS_SUPPORT, though. > > The test framework is probably useful on its own. > That would be a nicer name, but then we=E2=80=99d lose the automatic sett= ing > when MK_TESTS is enabled (unless we add another special case, which is > the opposite direction that I want to go in). How strongly do you feel > that=E2=80=99s a better name? Is _SUPPORT magic? I didn't know. I guess MK_TESTS_SUPPORT is good enough, especially if it's on by default. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no