Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:25:39 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        hawkeyd@visi.com
Cc:        Jesper Louis Andersen <jlouis@mongers.org>
Subject:   Re: mtree vs tripwire 
Message-ID:  <26259.1074104739@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:21:54 CST." <20040114182154.GA22444@sheol.localdomain> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040114182154.GA22444@sheol.localdomain>, D J Hawkey Jr writes:
>On Jan 14, at 07:09 PM, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
>> 
>> > This might seem really naive, but can mtree be used effectively as
>> > a native-to-core-OS tripwire equivalent? Would it be as efficient in
>> > terms of time-to-run and resource requirements?
>> 
>> Pro: distributed with base
>> Con: Only available for *BSD architectures as far as my knowledge goes.
>
>I'm aware of both, yes; hence my question. FreeBSD is all I'm dealing
>with, where my question is concerned.
>
>Is your reply from personal experience, or is it the same "Hey, it
>could..." as is my question? If the former, would you elaborate on the
>implementation details?

Mtree works as well if not slightly better (knows about file-flags)
on FreeBSD.

I'm using mtree a lot for various purposes, including a
contents-addressable archive system I've been using to make backups
of my home-dir for a couple of years.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26259.1074104739>