From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 31 13:48:10 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C1C3116A4CF; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:48:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7DADC43D2D; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:48:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i2VLm2tf029606;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:48:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:48:02 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403292214380.12734-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403311642150.28223-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
cc: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
Subject: Re: nss_ldap broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:48:10 -0000

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> 
> > Sean, could you report how this patch works for you?  Hmm, actually, it
> > looks almost identical to what you posted :-)  Is there a reason that
> > you stored the value of `__isthreaded' in a local variable?  Did that
> > make a difference for your case?
> 
> I'm unsure how nss_ldap was built to depend on libpthread (or
> any threads library).  I built it from ports and 'ldd' didn't
> report any dependency on a threads library.

I rebuilt it and now it does depend on libpthread.  I
think it is because I had openldap-client-2.1.26 which
didn't have a dependency on libpthread, but upgrading
to openldap-client-2.1.28 brought in the dependency.

Too bad these shared libraries can't be made to use
the libgcc trick, so they can still be thread-safe
but not depend on a threads library.  That would
also make it easier to use different thread libraries
for different applications relying on common shared
libraries.

-- 
Dan Eischen