Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:52:00 -0800
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r217871 - head/sbin/mount
Message-ID:  <4D54CE80.3060305@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110128194615.G1167@besplex.bde.org>
References:  <201101260506.p0Q56Bhf064034@svn.freebsd.org> <20110126173411.P972@besplex.bde.org> <4D408463.4000001@FreeBSD.org> <20110127153956.J1436@besplex.bde.org> <4D41D52D.2080906@FreeBSD.org> <20110128194615.G1167@besplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/28/2011 01:06, Bruce Evans wrote:
> The solaris server behaviour can't happen, except accidentally due to
> races :-).  Since the FreeBSD client doesn't support the noatime flag
> except to ignore it, it can't tell any server about it.

I don't mean to be a pest, but I'm confused as to why I observed what I 
observed if this is the case. I tested it a couple of times each way, so 
I'm confident that I saw a difference with and without noatime when 
mounting a solaris server.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D54CE80.3060305>