From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 11 05:52:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B1D1065675 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140B88FC22 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13982 invoked by uid 399); 11 Feb 2011 05:52:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 11 Feb 2011 05:52:02 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4D54CE80.3060305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:52:00 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110129 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans References: <201101260506.p0Q56Bhf064034@svn.freebsd.org> <20110126173411.P972@besplex.bde.org> <4D408463.4000001@FreeBSD.org> <20110127153956.J1436@besplex.bde.org> <4D41D52D.2080906@FreeBSD.org> <20110128194615.G1167@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20110128194615.G1167@besplex.bde.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r217871 - head/sbin/mount X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:52:04 -0000 On 01/28/2011 01:06, Bruce Evans wrote: > The solaris server behaviour can't happen, except accidentally due to > races :-). Since the FreeBSD client doesn't support the noatime flag > except to ignore it, it can't tell any server about it. I don't mean to be a pest, but I'm confused as to why I observed what I observed if this is the case. I tested it a couple of times each way, so I'm confident that I saw a difference with and without noatime when mounting a solaris server. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/