From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Fri Jul  9  7:21:46 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from fed-ef1.frb.gov (fed.frb.gov [132.200.32.32])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F44155F0
	for <freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  9 Jul 1999 07:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org)
Received: by fed-ef1.frb.gov; id KAA27643; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 10:21:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from m1pmdf.frb.gov(192.168.3.38) by fed.frb.gov via smap (V4.2)
	id xmab27478; Fri, 9 Jul 99 10:21:21 -0400
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 10:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Seth <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org>
Subject: Re: Benchmarking web apps on Apache
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907081631540.9761-100000@impatience.valueclick.com>
To: Ask Bjoern Hansen <ask@valueclick.com>
Cc: Donald Wilde <dwilde1@thuntek.net>,
	Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-id: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907091019130.99565-100000@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Regardless, the performance data are not in our favor.

SB

On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:

> tOn Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seth wrote:
> 
> ...
> > mod_perl handler stuff).  The "crucial" tests (dynamic content via cgi's)
> > showed the other OS to edge out our beloved FreeBSD.
> 
> Nah, get real. If you're concerned about performance, cgi will be your
> last option.
> 
> :-)
> 
>  - ask (doing almost all of his hits with apache/mod_perl on FreeBSD)
> 
> -- 
> ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/>
> more than 14M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message