From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 10:05:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AEC37B407; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from castle.org (castle.org [207.178.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A1043FBF; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:05:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nomad@castle.org) Received: from castle.org (localhost.castle.org [127.0.0.1]) by castle.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3UH4xWJ049968; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:04:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nomad@castle.org) Message-Id: <200304301704.h3UH4xWJ049968@castle.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: current@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 19 Apr 2003 01:02:34 +0200. <20030418230234.GG21011@elvis.mu.org> X-uri: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:04:59 -0700 From: Lee Damon Subject: Re: fxp0 problems - 5.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:05:02 -0000 Is anyone else having problems with fxp not working? I'm wondering if this problem is limited to T30s, or just to me. (I did the test below and verified that the new kernel with the old fxp.c does have this problem.) thanks, nomad > Lee Damon wrote: > > > Lee Damon wrote: > > > > Working kernel: > > > > $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c,v 1.162 2003/04/07 17:02:44 mux Exp $ > > > > > > > > Not working kernel: > > > > $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c,v 1.173 2003/04/16 09:16:55 sobomax > > > > Exp $ > > > > > > Could you try a kernel with revision 1.168 and see if it works? > > > > 1.168 has the same problem 1.173 does. > > I believe the problems you're having are not due to fxp(4) changes but > rather due to some recent changes in the PCI subsystem. The changes > that have been done since revision 1.162 are rather conservative > changes. It would thus be helpful if you could now try with revision > 1.162 of if_fxp.c, and the rest of the kernel sources unchanged. If it > still doesn't work with 1.162 while your older kernel works with the > same revision, it will show clearly that the problem lies elsewhere. > > Thanks for your help so far, > Maxime nomad ----------- - Lee "nomad" Damon - \ play: nomad@castle.org or castle!nomad \ work: nomad@ee.washington.edu \ /\ Seneschal, Castle PAUS. / \ "Celebrate Diversity" / \