From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 4 14:11:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A4EBB4 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BE019C5 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sA4EBK7c076309 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:11:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 190102] [tcp] net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=1 no longer works on FreeBSD 10+ [regression] Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:11:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: feld@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:11:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190102 Mark Felder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #6 from Mark Felder --- Closing this. There was an off-list discussion where some sensitive information was exchanged to further evaluate this situation. After some testing mistakes on both ends were resolved we concluded that the behavior is correct and manual attempts to invoke this bug were unsuccessful. It seems the remote scanning service we were using was possibly triggering a bug of its own. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.