Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 22:38:02 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Tinderbox Builds Message-ID: <8E63CA9F-CFFA-419B-A7DE-C91B31FFC862@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BnPUkzG2jAUOSeGmuZ6tKAfq16kNvkSxCMYMUkyDiVFmYxK9A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BnPUkzG2jAUOSeGmuZ6tKAfq16kNvkSxCMYMUkyDiVFmYxK9A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 8, 2013, at 22:22, Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently I have got 10 builds in my Tinderbox. These are following : > 10-CURRENT/amd64 w/clang (-r249422) > 10-CURRENT/amd64 w/gcc (-r249422) > 10-CURRENT/i386 w/clang (-r249422) > 10-CURRENT/i386 w/gcc (-r249422) > 8-STABLE/amd64 8.3 > 8-STABLE/i386 8.3 > 9-STABLE/amd64 w/clang 9.1 > 9-STABLE/amd64 w/gcc 9.1 > 9-STABLE/i386 w/clang 9.1 > 9-STABLE/i386 w/gcc 9.1 > > As per my understanding I think I am overkilling with the GCC versions as > for 9.1 and 10-CURRENT as for 9.1 and 10-CURRENT at -r249422 the default > compiler is CLANG. Am I correct or wrong? Clang is only the default compiler on 10-CURRENT. It will most likely never be the default on 9.x. That said, tinderboxing with both compilers is very nice, because sometimes a change can work just fine with the default compiler, but not with the other. Not everybody has the resources to compile that much variants... :-) -Dimitry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8E63CA9F-CFFA-419B-A7DE-C91B31FFC862>