From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 17:30:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC9037B401 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7F943F3F for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:30:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0011.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.192.11] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 193mQx-0001oo-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:30:24 -0700 Message-ID: <3E960B8C.B33C8F57@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:25:48 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RDB References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a48246029b7a7fcab44bf1155fdab59f94350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Semi-polling mode and net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:30:30 -0000 RDB wrote: > I'm curious whether anyone on this list has found real-world circumstances > in which either semi-polling mode or the net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable > setting improved performance, and if so what the circumstances were. Receiver livelock. However, it's not as good as full LRP. To see this, put a Gigabit card into a 32bit PCI @ 33MHz, and drive it full tilt from client machines. Watch as your data peaks, and then stops coming in at all, because all your mbufs are used up, and all your PCI bandwidth is being consumed by DMA's of incoming packets, and you have no cycles left over to do any work. Then go read the Jeffrey Mogul DECWRL paper from 1991, and be enlightened. -- Terry