From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 15 01:24:31 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9046916A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:24:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
	[128.208.78.105])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631F543D58
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:24:31 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	j0F1ORsF051598;	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:24:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)j0F1ORtI051597;
	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:24:27 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from sgk)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:24:27 -0800
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <20050115012427.GA51585@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr>
	<20050108005540.GB93568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net>
	<20050108034424.GA94365@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<41E54C51.4000300@fer.hr> <20050112164022.GD28786@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
	<41E553EB.10809@criticalmagic.com>
	<20050112172608.GB16201@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<41E86F55.4030906@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41E86F55.4030906@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: Richard Coleman <rcoleman@criticalmagic.com>
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Subject: Re: MFC wishlist
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:24:31 -0000

On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 02:18:13AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:44:27AM -0500, Richard Coleman wrote:
> >
> >>Brooks Davis wrote:
> >>
> >>>No, because the project has no ability to "assign
> >>>priority/resources". If someone who has is intrested and capable time
> >>>to work on it, does so in time, then it may be done, if not, it
> >>>won't.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Should we take this to mean that none of the developers are interested 
> >>in ULE any more?  That's the general feeling I get these days.  Just 
> >>curious.
> >>
> >
> >
> >As Brooks stated, Jeff is busy.  He works on it when he
> >can.  My problem is that system simply freezes.  I can't
> >get a kernel dump, so its hard to provide more info.
> 
> The broken crashdumps are really annoying. I've been harassing people on 
> freebsd-stable about it before christmas (rwatson IIRC)...
> 

This isn't a broken crash dump problem.  This is either a deadlock
or livelock type problem.

-- 
Steve