From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 6 16:31:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1099106564A; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDD08FC13; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so4404420fxm.13 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=OAh0l7jfD8BbDMYUMdyALXAQKjNRcu6EyP3ltoicZGk=; b=hjJDucMzgsXjpbVBQ0bs83pnfMJoA8JgIhe+Ce/ZqgMPfNikpvjd7laV9ZXD1NkhxM jqfw7i+SbL+FIeCJHU1hlxlXiNZJrguyamkdqH7TlA+XMqRiqXx/JyW0T6hZO65RQGRX anX6GNpi18+pjYA/nSsqDOUmDl0RLRz4WW6rg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=bfFekDxYSrg4tDV6eyeAr2kL0Gn1+CoG/UG1kFrDch3PlLShuBNps6Aob+rKuHurRz id/vM7+f0Hm4JZ+W0lVicl9EiH4TikyWE+p50RywF4EU+QLIWCWsuHpUYw7RgsyIqKCM Wr0alXL8xhMgjSrkIVq3hyIMEQCe2BalS77Xk= Received: by 10.223.103.72 with SMTP id j8mr13200004fao.4.1281112259404; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (lvps83-169-33-85.dedicated.hosteurope.de [83.169.33.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b11sm692045faq.30.2010.08.06.09.30.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:30:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Anonymous To: David Naylor References: <201008012222.o71MMirC065381@repoman.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:30:55 +0400 In-Reply-To: <201008012222.o71MMirC065381@repoman.freebsd.org> (Greg Lewis's message of "Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:22:44 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <86vd7nbt4w.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Greg Lewis , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/java/openjdk6 Makefile ports/java/openjdk7 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:31:02 -0000 Greg Lewis writes: > glewis 2010-08-01 22:22:44 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > java/openjdk6 Makefile > java/openjdk7 Makefile > Log: > . Mark MAKE_JOBS_SAFE. > . Use MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER as HOTSPOT_BUILD_JOBS. > > PR: 148753 > Submitted by: David Naylor > > Revision Changes Path > 1.26 +5 -3 ports/java/openjdk6/Makefile > 1.13 +5 -4 ports/java/openjdk7/Makefile Does this work? I'm just confused why the committer outsmarted submitter by silently dropping some important parts[1] of the patch in ports/148753. I can still reproduce that error reported by QAT. But pointyhat seems to not use make jobs so it's not in its logs[2]. [1] the workaround for ports/148754 - empty _MAKE_JOBS after bsd.port.post.mk [2] empty HOTSPOT_BUILD_JOBS indicates make jobs are not used http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/openjdk-7.0.82_1.log