From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 11 23:56:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D69AACD974 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD465CA6; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id e185so152813183vkb.1; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:56:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=HFtI969fvs/ZDVma1HGPEhrfttIG0wI8+fi44zQpoI8=; b=NK7uTUjAIjkPMIXNFXwqVcG3laO867jSG+W5Yy6wvn77E8R/G4zNnqsIZNx4FtcLFA qkS0ckzTvRamvZjcft8BLEysB02tUAL+WJ6o2XnapoLZnFDK1mvB+E/7Y+zvOsuLvrtw FHnJLgUT7osdgThLaJaN2Us9RHgp/UbhK7MxiaCUAPB8GJBSzGv4/elSmboO5mwnhTZH mo7DeB5AqIiorSN0T6VWWWZbm6MOc6QwpWi+3LLb+DNiwu7ut8DcU7pSrwbNk73sXpQI iajpXbFpfE+QGsN8BEgRgIdKnrItTFZzVi/t9TDavtwjQk0gphmmTYTV01J5HMy2E8De EbZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=HFtI969fvs/ZDVma1HGPEhrfttIG0wI8+fi44zQpoI8=; b=WDkt88QO3zC18zS9GIRqe+8voM8w3xJHwe2WUgPI55POEKQ4cg6zcKHxqm6JKXRwW3 Snkz+Am7vHtKg2zR1ltbb+twOBK4MiEJUQopPlYhXzJi1vseFnV3cOyR9iY5O6MUxmYA bvcxp4lUAyQ7M+1dEJO4WNZvI6ZSt2Bm6R1DBn8G8I8heQYPxhBdCSS7rS8297DvjyXB E5ltZ9+/11Mk0FfiYomqjKFgV5FfIb3GX+wa3GfrtLr4robDE+nfhOf5XAZ10FMiiV+/ ixWhylWVuVzqvk1OHnCIDGY0/HiTTB/MYrv0bF1eVFQg60GiF1m5jyLAOyzPhSroFnJd KszQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLqhIXgOR9/OLdkL6TQOXoxNv0mSBH7MmPtGb3Zte4LtANlJC94l3OdB+kpow4W2hJpb8LzQSkE6b2d/A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.21.4 with SMTP id 4mr12709259vkv.151.1457740617829; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:56:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.194.194 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:56:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56E359ED.1090106@freebsd.org> References: <56E359ED.1090106@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:56:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade From: Ultima To: Allan Jude Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:56:59 -0000 last pid: 96327; load averages: 41.78, 50.32, 50.07 up 1+05:19:23 18:52:47 169 processes: 11 running, 158 sleeping CPU: 24.4% user, 0.2% nice, 15.1% system, 0.1% interrupt, 60.3% idle Mem: 12G Active, 43G Inact, 186G Wired, 8867M Free ARC: 166G Total, 122G MFU, 38G MRU, 46M Anon, 753M Header, 5314M Other Swap: This is currently with poudriere que of 4000ish packages, right now at only 116 pkg per hour with 12 jails. Has been going for around 11 hours now. Usually it would be done by now with around 350ish pkg per hour with other jail versions running, only running the one right now. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 03/11/2016 18:49, Ultima wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Recently I upgraded to r296377, and notice a big hit in performance. > This > > system in question is a poudriere building system that usually has many > > jails running building around 200-400 pkg per hour for each jail. After > the > > upgrade, it is rare to see over 100 pkg per hour built. Possible > regression > > on recent commit? > > > > Previously was running (sorry had git src at the time) 8b372d1(master) > > built around a week ago. Any ideas what maybe causing this? I can provide > > more details if needed, someone in irc also mentioned noticing a hit in > > performance. > > > > > > Ultima > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Are you using ZFS? What does your memory utilization look like? > Can you provide the 'Mem' and 'ARC' lines from top(1) while building > packages (ideally, a good 20+ minutes into such a build)? > > -- > Allan Jude > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >