Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:27:26 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: two make questions Message-ID: <20021001152726.GL30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> In-Reply-To: <20021001152250.GA7580@colnta.acns.ab.ca> References: <20020923133431.GZ30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20021001085833.GD30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20021001152250.GA7580@colnta.acns.ab.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# davidc@issci.ca / 2002-10-01 09:22:50 -0600:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:58:33AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >
> > I need to run my newly created Makefiles on one sorry RedHat box, and
> > the pmake package just doesn't cut it. So, since I couldn't find any
> > other rpm on redhat.com, what are my chances should I, say, want to use
> > /usr/ports/Mk/* on Linux? (Not that this is actually the case, my
> > Makefiles are pretty simple.)
> >
>
> One of the projects I'm working on is a build system much like FreeBSD's
> and instead of restricting our features we simply ported pmake from
> FreeBSD. The Solaris port took me about 10 minutes, while the win32 port
> was a little more involved (it would be easier without fork() :)), so I
> doubt a RH port will be difficult (I hesitate to even call it a port).
for someone who doesn't really know C (as in: "I can read some, but
finding out how to make a FreeBSD program work on Linux?")?
> You can either keep your makefiles very simple (good luck!), or you can
> port pmake and just move the whole system over.
looks like i'll have to wait till i have the time to reinstall the
server.
--
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.7-RC
5:25PM up 14 days, 40 mins, 18 users, load averages: 0.06, 0.12, 0.10
end
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021001152726.GL30361>