From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 22 14:23:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15DF37B4C5 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bandix@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA55509; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 17:24:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 17:24:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" To: nimrodm@email.com Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: divert as module? In-Reply-To: <20001022230918.B440@localhost.bsd.net.il> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Nimrod Mesika wrote: >> Or can I use ppp's nat together with ipfw? > >I see no reason why you can't. In fact, it will probably be more >efficient as you will not need two user processes (ppp and natd). Furthermore, I don't see why ipfw gains you anything over ppp filters. Just run w/ ppp -nat and setup some ppp filters as explained in ppp(8). You'll be good to go. -- Brandon D. Valentine "Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example." -- Mark Twain, Pudd'nhead Wilson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message