From owner-freebsd-sparc  Wed Dec  9 19:19:16 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA16566
          for freebsd-sparc-outgoing; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 19:19:16 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns2.sminter.com.ar (ns2.sminter.com.ar [200.10.100.11])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA16551
          for <freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 19:19:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from Recabarren!fpscha@ns2.sminter.com.ar)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
          by ns2.sminter.com.ar (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id AAA21811 for FreeBSD.ORG!freebsd-sparc; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 00:19:18 -0300 (GMT)
>Received: (from fpscha@localhost)
	by localhost.schapachnik.com.ar (8.8.8/8.8.5) id AAA00761;
	Thu, 10 Dec 1998 00:04:44 -0300 (ART)
From: "Fernando P. Schapachnik" <fpscha@localhost.schapachnik.com.ar>
Message-Id: <199812100304.AAA00761@localhost.schapachnik.com.ar>
Subject: Re: Read this...
In-Reply-To: <19981210110516.V12688@freebie.lemis.com> from Greg Lehey at "Dec 10, 98 11:05:16 am"
To: grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 00:04:39 -0300 (ART)
Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, bright@hotjobs.com, freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: fpscha@schapachnik.com.ar
X-OS: FreeBSD 2.2.6 - http://www.freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

En un mensaje anterior Greg Lehey escribió:
[...]
> I suppose I should point you people to
> http://www.lemis.com/x/sunworld-bsd.html, which is a draft of an
> article I've submitted to SunWorld.  This is for review only in the
> present form; please don't distribute it, but I'd be interested in
> comments.
> 
> One thing in particular occurred to me in this context: why does Sun
> want Linux or *BSD?   On the whole, Solaris <whatever number it is
> this week> is a pretty good operating system, and neither Linux nor
> *BSD can equal it.  What advantage would I have running FreeBSD on my
> UltraSparc?  Or should we be doing what NetBSD and OpenBSD are already

Let me disagree with you. Having work with both of them I can say that 
FreeBSD is far superior from Solaris. More to the point: it is more 
secure, it's *open source* and it's more reliable when you have to change 
your setup several times a week (bringing up and down interfaces, 
daemons, etc.).

Please note I haven't read your article yet (no conection at this time :().

Kind regards!


Fernando P. Schapachnik
fernando@schapachnik.com.ar

/-------------------------------------------\
| Atención: Mensaje generado en entorno     |
| libre de productos MicroChot.             |
| No contiene HTML, adjuntos en Worst,      |
| ni basura similar. Leer con tranquilidad. |
\-------------------------------------------/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message