From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Apr 16 10:18:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from confusion.skinner.org (confusion.skinner.org [209.3.31.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCC015970 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 10:18:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from skinner@skinner.org) Received: from confusion.skinner.org (skinner@confusion.skinner.org [209.3.31.16]) by confusion.skinner.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA07599 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 13:23:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from skinner@skinner.org) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 13:23:26 -0400 (EDT) From: S K I N N E R To: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: InfoWorld. Article Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "freebsd offers a sound open source alteranative" There seems to be a good article in April 12ths issues of InfoWorld IT journal. I was actually happy to read an article that was mostly all "FBSD" and not one where they compare and contrast and or state "but Linux is more popular". I have read many articles that the above, and that there is more "programs for it" Which makes me laugh sometimes. Since most people don't realize the cross support between the 2 in "most" programs. This article written by James C Luh actual has some excellent research done on the whole concept of FreeBSD and that it is an equal (IMHO better) alternative to open source os's :) ******************************************************************** Robert Skinner skinner{at}skinner[dot]org -------------------------------------------------------------------- Skinner's Personal Ego http://www.skinner.org ******************************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message