Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:34:08 +1000 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/fxp if_fxpreg.h
Message-ID:  <20030407073334.E2071@gamplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030406210522.GA1750@elvis.mu.org>
References:  <200304052346.h35Nkwoi037742@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030406134416.A3578@gamplex.bde.org> <20030406210522.GA1750@elvis.mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, Maxime Henrion wrote:

> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Bit-fields of other integer types are an unportable gcc extension.
> > ...
> I somehow thought that C99 wasn't only allowing the use of other integer
> types, but also defined the behaviour when using them, but I see that I
> was wrong.  Even though I find it a pity that we can't use uint8_t in a
> portable way - because we're really talking bytes there - I'll backout
> this part of my changes.

Thanks.

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030407073334.E2071>