From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 20:13:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1143D16A4CE for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:13:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from s1.vhost.cz (s1.vhost.cz [82.208.27.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019BA43D2D for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:13:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from konfer@mikulas.com) Received: (qmail 1315 invoked by uid 89); 14 Sep 2004 22:13:04 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2004 22:13:04 +0200 Received: from QMQPqq client ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (s1.vhost.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10628) with QMQPqq id 01213-01 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:13:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (HELO ?195.122.218.78?) (jiri@mikulas.com@195.122.218.78) by s1.vhost.cz with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Sep 2004 22:13:03 +0200 Message-ID: <414750CD.1000905@mikulas.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:13:01 +0200 From: Jiri Mikulas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040713 X-Accept-Language: cs, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at s1.vhost.cz Subject: amd64 memory usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:13:07 -0000 Hello I have FreeBSD new64 5.3-BETA4 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA4 #0: Mon Sep 13 00:07:19 CEST 2004 root@new64:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NEW64 amd64 without debug options in kernel with SCHED_4BSD Is it normal that processes consume so much memory ? for example sshd 29480K ~~~ cut ~~~~~~~~~~ last pid: 8740; load averages: 0.19, 0.59, 0.64 up 1+10:44:04 11:05:13 78 processes: 1 running, 77 sleeping CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle Mem: 184M Active, 532M Inact, 116M Wired, 37M Cache, 111M Buf, 44M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 28K Used, 2048M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 29913 www 20 0 161M 24276K lockf 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 29915 www 96 0 161M 24404K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 61702 www 20 0 161M 23524K lockf 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 29914 www 20 0 161M 24000K lockf 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 29916 www 20 0 161M 24404K lockf 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 29943 www 20 0 161M 23648K lockf 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 29912 www 20 0 161M 24268K lockf 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 29944 www 20 0 161M 23492K lockf 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 29941 www 20 0 161M 23088K lockf 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 61709 www 20 0 161M 22896K lockf 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 29911 root 96 0 160M 14676K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% httpd 595 root 96 0 55832K 31880K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% perl5.8.5 453 clamav 20 0 54452K 47560K kserel 0:01 0.00% 0.00% clamd 73746 mysql 20 0 52720K 15500K kserel 0:08 0.00% 0.00% mysqld 16031 mik 96 0 29656K 2968K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% sshd 15029 mik 96 0 29628K 2980K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% sshd 15015 root 4 0 29484K 2784K sbwait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 16023 root 4 0 29480K 2788K sbwait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 83713 root 4 0 29476K 2788K sbwait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 92178 root 4 0 29476K 2632K sbwait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 83722 mik 96 0 29456K 2864K select 0:06 0.00% 0.00% sshd 92183 mik 96 0 29456K 2728K select 0:04 0.00% 0.00% sshd 11888 pgsql 96 0 28880K 3504K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% postgres 579 root 99 0 21140K 5232K select 0:24 0.00% 0.00% snmpd 11889 pgsql 96 0 20312K 3484K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% postgres 11890 pgsql 96 0 19432K 3516K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% postgres 382 root 96 0 18500K 2292K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 83740 mik 8 0 17164K 1388K wait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% su 15037 mik 8 0 17164K 1388K wait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% su 16039 mik 8 0 17164K 1388K wait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% su 92190 mik 8 0 17164K 1244K wait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% su ~~~cut~~~ I updated to last RELENG_5 5.3-BETA4 #1: Tue Sep 14 11:00:53 CEST 2004 and it's similar Has anybody the same experience? thanks for reply Jiri