From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 09:10:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AF937B405 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vsmtp2.tin.it (vsmtp2.tin.it [212.216.176.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C3043F75 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:10:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from flag@tin.it) Received: from newluxor.skynet.org (80.182.24.132) by vsmtp2.tin.it (7.0.019) id 3F17B3730042F3A4 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:10:43 +0200 Received: by newluxor.skynet.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id AC9B98C; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:12:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:12:25 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati To: FreeBSD_Net Message-ID: <20030729161225.GA231@newluxor.skynet.org> References: <20030728224737.GA47439@newluxor.skynet.org> <20030729103042.GA230@newluxor.skynet.org> <20030729141641.GA257@newluxor.skynet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030729141641.GA257@newluxor.skynet.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Useless-Header: Look ma, it's a # sign! X-Operating-System: FreeBSD newluxor.skynet.org 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE Subject: Re: Differences between netgraph nodes in 4.x and 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:10:47 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > well, i answer to myself: > > it seems it's not my mistake, cause you can trigger it with a > plain original tee node too. =P Ok, i promise this is the last msg: it was my mistake, whe i deleted the tee node, the ether node short circuited the lower & upper hook, and then it was impossibile to connect again something to the ether hook. solution: rmhook one of the ether hook, and connect again mynode... =P maybe it would be nice to change the error msg from: "File exists" to "hook already connected" or something like this. bye -- Paolo GUFI: http://www.gufi.org