Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:37:43 -0500 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: FBSD Doc project <doc@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] (partial) patch to clean up authors.ent / developers.ent duplication Message-ID: <20121128143743.GA1473@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <50B5E975.5090601@freebsd.org> References: <50B52AAD.7030004@freebsd.org> <20121128000000.GA1303@glenbarber.us> <50B5E975.5090601@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:37:41AM +0100, Ren=E9 Ladan wrote: > > Thanks very much for starting this. > >=20 > > Unless there is objection from anyone, please feel free to create > > a projects branch for these changes. > >=20 > Which triggers some questions: > - is projects/ open for normal committers? Yes. It seems many people missed the announcement. :\ Shortly after the SGML->XML conversion, hrs@ opened projects/ and user/ spaces. > - what would be a suitable name? "entities" comes to mind, in which we > could also do a "FreeBSD" -> "&os;" sweep later. I've never been big on "what should we call it?" type of things. :-) "entities" is fine, in my opinion, since as you point out, after the authors.ent/developers.ent merge, that branch can be used for a full sweep to consistify &os; usage. > - since I do not have a full doc bit, do I need approval for every > commit to projects/ (and at some point the final merge) ? >=20 As the branch is not "production", I would say you should not need approval to commit there.[1] I do think a final call for review should be done prior to the merge. As far as approval goes for the final merge, I will approve the commit for you when it is ready. Glen [1] I will check with other doceng@ folks to see if there is any disagreement on this, and will follow up if necessary. --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQtiG3AAoJEFJPDDeguUajOLoIALdB6J8pxZrA3tb1hW4NZrKV ftc6QhCBXxDo9dKTmBn18kMSOHLB+WK9cH80Fele2z6epgfZP4YX4+4rSuDvWj07 yyAxfJX7vvZb4fIzwTGLHSnWP4SRaKyf1JZkgvkGcUDaEiGbU5GmGl4Zd3uxW5pl +g1/BH8pr+Pp1dwlROxRvZVTK/KUu4PmuUMziqU4af8HlCjhqtvAYHIfzg7uPjJr dhwbpZiCLfeazQx1coDiRlcZr9z0CS3y5euGsmgRp6dyNKh5XoFtoKx6Y8AvM8DH 7GyYytfreNb+nOmeRmz75n5SAhJNloJKJZjUZTiD19bhyBpmPIxdqdQJv6N44Qs= =oNHD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121128143743.GA1473>