Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 18:31:45 +0100 From: "mal content" <artifact.one@googlemail.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: Benjamin Lutz <mail@maxlor.com>, karma@freebsd.org, trustedbsd-discuss@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SoC: Distributed Audit Daemon project Message-ID: <8e96a0b90705271031s5349f45dt238ff3a9eb53fe0f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070527165641.I13311@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200705250322.22259.karma@FreeBSD.org> <200705252004.38092.mail@maxlor.com> <200705261149.18510.karma@FreeBSD.org> <200705271830.59646.mail@maxlor.com> <20070527165641.I13311@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27/05/07, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > Having a generic, more secure and reliable (local) logging mechnism > should be discussed in at least another thread. You may as well think > of taking this idea to IETF as RFC 3164 lives there as a Memo these > days and it might be a general enough thing for everyone. I wonder if > there are no lightwight but more secure and reliable implementations > out there already. Maybe time for some research. http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html Obviously the license would require somebody to re-implement it under a BSD license and add networking capabilities, but the design is sound. I use it everywhere in place of the stock syslog (takes some re-architecturing - there's no longer a centralised syslog daemon). MC
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8e96a0b90705271031s5349f45dt238ff3a9eb53fe0f>