From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 07:26:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70CE16A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:26:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0B443D4C for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:26:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i3LEQWgr047946; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:26:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:26:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040421.082635.132225726.imp@bsdimp.com> To: mattias@schlenker-webdesign.de From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <40852B78.3060304@schlenker-webdesign.de> References: <408524AC.7040506@schlenker-webdesign.de> <40852A1F.2060605@tellme3times.com> <40852B78.3060304@schlenker-webdesign.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: chris@tellme3times.com Subject: Re: device uscanner in GENERIC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:26:36 -0000 In message: <40852B78.3060304@schlenker-webdesign.de> Mattias Schlenker writes: : Chris wrote: : > I did not have to recompile my kernel for my USB scanner to work and I : > am using uscanner. : > 5.1 5.2 both worked. : : This may be... But many -- especially many cheap -- scanners nowadays : work better with ugen/libusb or even just work with ugen/libusb. So : removing "device uscanner" from GENERIC would mean that someone like you : who *wants* to use uscanner has to load uscanner.ko, which is far less : work than recompiling the kernel. : : In 4.x it worked perfectly for all sides. Removing "device uscanner" : from GENERIC would result in a situation that is more close to the : situation with 4.x than the situation today is. Hmmm, the cheap scanner I recently purchased worked great with xsane + uscanner after a minor tweak to the uscanner list of supported devices. Warner