From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 16 21:56:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA12421 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 21:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA12415; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 21:56:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id VAA27914; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 21:19:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <32DF0BA0.41C67EA6@whistle.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 21:18:24 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Reed CC: Brian Somers , proff@suburbia.net, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw patches to test References: <199701170143.RAA01789@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Darren Reed wrote: > > In some mail from Brian Somers, sie said: > > What's the difference between the above and > > > > ipfw add allow from 192.168.23.0/30 to 140.145.230.0/24 > > ipfw add deny from any to 140.145.230.0/24 > > Logically, none. not true the "not" case will continue on to do other tests in cases where the other example will not > > >From the technical side, more memory, longer list, etc. > > Darren