From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 23 05:51:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6241106564A for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B68F8FC25 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDSK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m6N5p1iQ090565; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:51:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Razmig K" , "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:51:56 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 In-Reply-To: <488226D8.307@gmail.com> Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Subject: RE: Extracting tracks as WAV from a worn-out CD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:51:03 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Razmig K > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 10:40 AM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: Extracting tracks as WAV from a worn-out CD >=20 >=20 > Kevin Kinsey a =C3=A9crit : > > Not trying to be overly arrogant, but aren't you asking > > something similar to "why doesn't my broken car run"? > No, I'm aware of the implications of having a "broken car". The = question=20 > asked for explanations, if any, on why successful extraction ----------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > was=20 > possible via the SCSI interface while it wasn't via the ATAPI = interface. > That statement implies that the data extracted isn't damaged. Damage in a wave file is nothing - it's a click or pop in the song. Damage in a data file generally scotches the entire file. Ted