Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 07:36:51 +0200 (MET DST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, peter@bonkers.taronga.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any experience on tcl7.4/tk4.0 ? Message-ID: <199506250536.HAA11035@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <199506241723.DAA28701@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jun 25, 95 03:23:16 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The fpmask() call is certainly required. The only uncertainty is whether > tcl already has it. NetBSD doesn't need it since all FPU exceptions are > masked by default in NetBSD. It is not in tcl (at least, tcl7.4 coredumps with a FP exception without it). Luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506250536.HAA11035>