From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:37:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AAC16A4CF for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:37:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DFB43D5F for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:37:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so70620wri for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:37:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=I+VgVnVt651dDRszaJqbAoA8fHnCtMgiuNOQQJZNAI+tu/qxdlkSODgORfhFich3o7djeRNnz71hAs+mhWR0NNuqq9N7Z76UH9uAB8JsgU9OXObtzRKhb9GL8FtU/EkBFdWbtnkr6l9reHkXRD9ebmGZrrRl312n4i4tkhJxlsQ= Received: by 10.54.47.62 with SMTP id u62mr2184338wru; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:37:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.34 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:37:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:37:47 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <44zn0gohxg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <44sm697xqk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <44zn0gohxg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: refuse X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:37:59 -0000 On 14 Dec 2004 13:26:03 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Joshua Lokken writes: > > > On 14 Dec 2004 09:36:35 -0500, Lowell Gilbert > > > Why not just run it through cpp(1) and use the output? > > > I used to do that with my sendmail configuration... > > > > Hello Lowell, would you mind elaborating on this? How would > > one 'run it through cpp'? > > cpp -P < input_file > output_file Thank you, Lowell. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate