From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 14 01:21:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD8916A41A for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E7513C468 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l8E1LHjO058152; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:21:18 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org) Message-Id: <200709140121.l8E1LHjO058152@drugs.dv.isc.org> To: Charles Sprickman From: Mark Andrews In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:19:41 -0400." Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:21:17 +1000 Sender: marka@isc.org Cc: Darren Pilgrim , Andreas Pettersson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9.3.1 - How to get rid of AAAA querys? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:21:28 -0000 > On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > > > Andreas Pettersson wrote: > >> Mark Andrews wrote: > >>> Why don't you go the other way and get yourself IPv6 > >>> connectivity. You do realise that you will require it to > >>> reach many sites in about 3 years time as they will be IPv6 > >>> only > >> > >> For almost 10 years I've heard discussions about the successor to IPv4, bu > t > >> from my point of view (may differ from others..) not much has happened. Of > > >> course, I can imagine that when the wheel starts rolling for real things > >> might change quickly. 3 years may prove to be correct, but are there any > >> clear signs pointing in this direction? > > > > The proponents of IPv6 have claimed growing real-world deployment for the > > last several years. There is yet no significant commercial deployment--the > > > real world still runs on IPv4. > > Just adding another "real world" datapoint... I'd love to get my hands > dirty with IPv6. I contacted both of our upstreams, Level3 and HE.net. > > Level3 never responded, if anyone has details on what their deal is, > please share (offlist). > > HE.net wanted both more money and for us to order another port with them. HE claim they are now dual stacked. You shouldn't need a second port. > For the 0.0001% of our users that have expressed interest in v6 > connectivity, we're not going to pay for another FE port just to > experiment. I'm sure most other Tier-2 local/regional ISPs feel the same > way. > > If there were a free and "best effort" service offered by any of our > upstreams though, I'd jump at it. > > My buddy Ike over at NYCBUG does have a bunch of pictures of cheap > consumer IPv6 home routers from his trip to Japan. Apparently it's quite > widespread there. > > Charles > > > -- > > Darren Pilgrim > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org