Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:48:37 +0200 From: Michal Mertl <mime@traveller.cz> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: ndis, iwi, ipw users Message-ID: <1123685317.966.34.camel@genius1.i.cz> In-Reply-To: <1123678777.966.2.camel@genius1.i.cz> References: <42F94526.9090509@errno.com> <1123678777.966.2.camel@genius1.i.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michal Mertl wrote: > Sam Leffler wrote: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/curchan.patch > > > > has changes to resolve an issue with not recognizing when an ap moves to > > a different channel. It eliminates the use of ic->ic_bss->ni_chan to > > identify the current channel while scanning. It's been reviewed and > > tested ok on ath, wi, ral, and ural devices. I need folks to verify it > > does not break ndis, iwi, and ipw devices (there are changes for awi but > > so far as I know noone uses awi). > > > > I want to get this committed to HEAD soon so quick feedback on those > > devices would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > Sam > > > My notebook with ipw still works. I have set up hostap on ath on channel > 1 and associated the notebook to it. I then changed the channel on the > AP and the notebook immediately switched too. I've just noticed that the channel reported by ifconfig on the ipw station is wrong. genius1# ifconfig ipw0 ipw0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 00:0c:f1:3e:8b:07 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (DS/11Mbps) status: associated ssid testap channel 1 bssid 00:0b:6b:35:dc:f0 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100 bintval 100 genius1# ifconfig ipw0 list scan SSID BSSID CHAN RATE S:N INT CAPS testap 00:0b:6b:35:dc:f0 9 11M 62:0 100 E genius1# ping 192.168.0.1 PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=8.801 ms ^C --- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 8.801/8.801/8.801/0.000 ms genius1# Is this expected? I've never really checked it before. Michal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1123685317.966.34.camel>