From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 05:35:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E5437B401 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 05:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kosh.oneofum.net (mail.oneofum.net [66.11.163.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFE243FA3 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 05:35:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gunkel@oneofum.net) Received: by kosh.oneofum.net (Postfix, from userid 2001) id E01FFDC82E; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:29:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kosh.oneofum.net (kosh.oneofum.net [66.11.163.245]) by kosh.oneofum.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 425ADDC7D3; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:29:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 198.151.13.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gunkel) by mail.oneofum.net with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:29:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <64847.198.151.13.15.1058272141.squirrel@mail.oneofum.net> In-Reply-To: <3F13C47F.C61B03DB@chatusa.com> References: <3F13C47F.C61B03DB@chatusa.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:29:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alvin Gunkel" To: "DanB" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_01,IN_REP_TO,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,REFERENCES, USER_AGENT version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd Subject: Re: Backup over the internet. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:35:15 -0000 I've been using a program called rdiff-backup ( http://rdiff-backup.stanford.edu/ ), based on librsync. This package creates a mirror of your server (or any portion thereof) on a remote server, and keeps track of changes. It only sends changes (ie diff) across the wire, including binaries, so after the initial copy it's pretty bandwidth efficient. It's not in ports ( or wasn't recently ) and takes a little extra work to build it, but IMHO it's well worth the effort. Alvin Gunkel