From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 7 6:47:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from straylight.ringlet.net (support.nanolink.com [217.75.134.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 431E737B400 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 06:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 5181 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Mar 2002 14:47:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:47:24 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: GB Clark Cc: mitko@rila.bg, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Swapping performance Message-ID: <20020307164724.D377@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: GB Clark , mitko@rila.bg, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020307090707.GC26621@elvis.mu.org> <20020307142759.0d95d467.mitko@rila.bg> <20020307080906.367be8df.gclarkii@vsservices.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a2FkP9tdjPU2nyhF" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020307080906.367be8df.gclarkii@vsservices.com>; from gclarkii@vsservices.com on Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:09:06AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --a2FkP9tdjPU2nyhF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:09:06AM -0600, GB Clark wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:27:59 +0200 > Dimitar Peikov wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 04:01:58 -0800 (PST) > > Julian Elischer wrote: > >=20 > > > he said -stable.. > > >=20 > > > what are the malloc options on -stable? > > >=20 > > > maybe we should make sure that they are null=20 > > >=20 > > > ln -s ">" /etc/malloc.conf > > > (I hope that helps) :) > > >=20 > >=20 > > I've tested it with : > >=20 > > cc -O6 -o malloc_test malloc_test.c >=20 > That -O6 does not look right from here. Do we support anything over -O2? ISTR that -On is exactly the same for -O2 for n > 2; or is this stale info? Maybe GCC 3.x supports higher optimization levels; still, I don't think this would make any significant difference. Note to Dimitar: maybe compiling it with -static would make it just a little bit faster; then again, it may not. >=20 > And how about some source for malloc_test.c? The fact of running somethi= ng at -O6 > started some bells ringing. The source was attached to Dimitar's original post :) G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 I am jealous of the first word in this sentence. --a2FkP9tdjPU2nyhF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjyHfXwACgkQ7Ri2jRYZRVPTFwCfVfevfdLGDyueXKvaBTSOyIDL RX8AmwU8tARrHknSFlJMVc5Qy7Sr9JEJ =ycjT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a2FkP9tdjPU2nyhF-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message