From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Nov 7 20:16:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D952A286F6 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 20:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE3F1F6F for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 20:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DBBBEA286F4; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 20:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB550A286F3 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 20:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB9741F6E; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 20:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by pacdm15 with SMTP id dm15so132518808pac.3; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 12:16:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=reuvFdbFCtpRdOPz8umptfieS+e2AGFoggAfpgUnMRw=; b=C9tq9if4A/7u/cy1xEYcR0WfHnsjoebf5BDQiVEu8loqYTU1tBjcEZ3dusx/HJieO2 FtiGWmDY0O6qVRH9ELYMHxlDwK5Ly960VLTgUcYKIh3ErexFEsMFonVePXcVLnUAGWGH meHvt+rTJ5HzrVPL334bW/j2y41UZoSwriQhIDe2z6pvMIR8TK61IkuPA8IVDQcNYvnA V3+p/6eHHoM32FVbb/LSir+nAOUL5K+fwVb9PGCGIEFpzvQhL3nS4TdtZC74bbaXkxfC PFI+YOJ22490eljUehtMcw0Yg00xIZ2ZHiTFfu7ctEKIzI0k64VnlWEqW5dhhlxtox/P hHqQ== X-Received: by 10.68.227.69 with SMTP id ry5mr28291305pbc.148.1446927380212; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 12:16:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.20.7] (c-24-16-212-205.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [24.16.212.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id yi8sm7390638pab.22.2015.11.07.12.16.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 Nov 2015 12:16:19 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: mtree patch for WITHOUT_LPR From: NGie Cooper In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 12:16:18 -0800 Cc: Bryan Drewery , gad@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <563E2EB1.6030005@shatow.net> <563E4816.6030202@shatow.net> To: Dmitry Morozovsky X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 20:16:21 -0000 > On Nov 7, 2015, at 10:56, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: >=20 > On Sat, 7 Nov 2015, Bryan Drewery wrote: >=20 >>>>> +/set type=3Ddir uname=3Droot gname=3Dwheel mode=3D0755 >>>>> +. >>>>> + include >>>>> + atf-c >>>>> + .. >>>>> + atf-c++ >>>>> + .. >>>>=20 >>>> This diff is incorrect. >>>=20 >>> Yes, as Brian noted, this is completely orthogonal. >>>=20 >>>> There are a lot of other things that need to be fixed if we go down = this=20 >>>> path. Do you have a plan or idea of what all needs to be fixed? >>>=20 >>> Well, I do not like the idea of tons of micro mtree files; OTOH, it = would be=20 >>> great if we could avoid creation of unnecessary directories/files = when=20 >>> particular WITHOU_* know is set. >>=20 >> Another way of looking at this problem is that if a directory is in = the >> dist mtrees, it should not be listed as an OLD_DIRS. >=20 > ... and this principle I do like much more, yes. It's no harm to have = an empty=20 > subtree. Agreed to the above. Some people disagree (and bugs have been filed for = it), but as long as there=E2=80=99s a uniform consensus, I think we=E2=80=99= ll be fine. Thanks, -NGie=