From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Jul  2 05:17:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA00675
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 05:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA00669
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 05:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66])
	by hwcn.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA25737;
	Wed, 2 Jul 1997 08:17:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost)
	by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id IAA03865;
	Wed, 2 Jul 1997 08:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 08:17:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org>
X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca
Reply-To: hoek@hwcn.org
To: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>
cc: Francisco Reyes <francisco@natserv.com>,
        FreeBSD Chat List <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Why Not Make tcsh the default shell?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970702031556.4889A-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970702081619.2652B-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Annelise Anderson wrote:

> However, new users do not know enough not to like the default; they do
> not know that there is something better that is not entirely different
> but merely enhanced; and they don't know enough to get whatever shell
> they like. And in fact the process of adding a shell to /etc/shells,

Perhaps a list of ``reccomended packages''?

Hm.  I can just imagine the fight that the would start...  ;-)


--
Outnumbered?  Maybe.  Outspoken?  Never!
tIM...HOEk