From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Mar 15 10:42:54 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA03914
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 10:42:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA03902
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 10:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA04505; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 11:33:27 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199703151833.LAA04505@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: getopt and EOF vs -1
To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 11:33:27 -0700 (MST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, imp@village.org
In-Reply-To: <199703150831.TAA29813@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Mar 15, 97 07:31:30 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[ ... -1 instead of manifest EOF, which is -1 ... ]

> There are about 331 possibilities.  Do you really wish to fix them all?
> (y or n) :-)
> 
> I don't think the ones in code with an active vendor (other than us)
> should be changed, but there isn't much point in changing our code until
> others catch up.

Someone has to go first.

Sending patches to the vendors would be a good start.


					Regards,
					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.