Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:28:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194245] [MAINTAINER] www/typo3-lts: update to 6.2.5 Message-ID: <bug-194245-13-dNfIOxJJRn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194245-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194245-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194245 --- Comment #8 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Helmut Ritter from comment #7) > So if you want me to drop maintainership or if you completely want to remove > Typo3 from the ports tree just do so. I don't want to tell you to do anything. But you also should not expect that shifting QA of the port you volunteered to maintain will make it attractive. Speaking for myself, I really don't care at all when ports are removed from the tree. Some users think it's the biggest sin in the world ("it was *building*, how dare you remove it?!") Maybe nobody cares about this port at all. I have no idea what the port even does so I don't have an opinion on that. I just wanted to point out that there's no kind of "prime directive" to save ports at any cost. > If not please point a spare time freebsd user (me) to an appropriate > location so I can continue to contribute my part to the FreeBSD project. I don't know what this is asking. This whole thing started when I asked if you could (optionally) provide a poudriere laptop and you said you had no resources. Unless your freebsd is a 5G VM or a atom-cpu laptop, I would be surprised if you truly can't use it. You said you didn't want to provide the logs. You aren't required to, so really that's the end of the story. I'm not going to take the PR though. I've got a 150 others to choose from where a big percentage of the submitters do provide test logs. All I was doing is "triage" which is where I say, "hey, this PR is probably ready to be committed" and move it to "patch-ready" status so that the person committing it is highly confident that not much work, if any, is needed on that PR. Without running this though poudriere myself, or using other factors like reputation from previous work or educated guess from the patch itself, I can't don't that. Anyway -- no need to do anything. Somebody else may come by doing triage and think differently, or may just take the PR and commit it. That's their prerogative. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194245-13-dNfIOxJJRn>