From owner-freebsd-audit Wed May 2 18:11:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA2B37B423 for ; Wed, 2 May 2001 18:11:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: from spike.unixfreak.org (spike [63.198.170.139]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8E73E28; Wed, 2 May 2001 18:11:38 -0700 (PDT) To: Will Andrews , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sha1 support in md5(1) In-Reply-To: <20010502180444.D5017@casimir.physics.purdue.edu>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on "Wed, 2 May 2001 18:04:44 -0500" Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 18:11:38 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010503011138.1C8E73E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Will Andrews writes: > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:37:19PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > [..] > > des@des ~% ln -s $(which openssl) rmd160 > > des@des ~% ./rmd160 /boot/kernel/kernel > > RIPEMD160(/boot/kernel/kernel)= eab7dceb96a2492faee5cd3984affc05fe2afc63 > > Anyway, in light of this, I'll have to lean with DES. If anything, you Me too. When I wrote the patch I had functionality in mind, not the reinvention of the wheel. Since we apparently already have this functionality, that's fine with me. > could just add a couple LINKS to openssl. In fact, it seems the md5(1) Not really necessary. It's not that hard to do `openssl md5` or `openssl sha1`. No need to pollute [/usr]/[s]bin with gratuitous links. Thanks, Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message