From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 14:33:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F6D106564A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:33:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.17.241.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880198FC17 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5FEXJYr073095; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:33:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q5FEXJC6073094; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:33:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:33:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <201206151433.q5FEXJC6073094@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, wblock@wonkity.com In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.9.6-20101126 ("Burnside") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/6.4-PRERELEASE-20080904 (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:33:34 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: devd problem with 9-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:33:37 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > [...] > > > > > attach 50 { > [...] > > Even with those changes, devd is not triggering on my scanner attach: > > match "subsystem" "DEVICE"; > match "type" "ATTACH"; > match "cdev" "ugen[0-9]+.[0-9]+"; > match "vendor" "0x04b8"; > match "product" "0x010a"; > action "echo HERE! $cdev > /tmp/zoot"; Have you tried to put those lines inside a "notify" block instead of an "attach" block? The documentation is not very clear about the difference between an "attach" block an a "notify" block with $type=ATTACH, but it probably wouldn't hurt to try both. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert Sewell