Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:07:47 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A myth that has been omission in FreeBSD Advocacy =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Project=3F?= Message-ID: <20140516130747.32753887@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <5375898D.8030207@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <COL128-W383D0FC2EA9C1B34A3909C90360@phx.gbl> <20140516033049.229275a0.freebsd@edvax.de> <5375898D.8030207@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Thu, 15 May 2014 23:44:13 -0400 Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > On 15/05/2014 21:30, Polytropon wrote: > > And which big corporation would admit that they are using a > > product that can be obtained for free which helps them to earn > > money? Would they admit that a "hobby OS" powers their innermost > > parts? Would they even know that the Internet itself works as > > we know it simply because UNIX and BSD does exist? > > uh... both Netflix and Juniper are quite open about their use of > FreeBSD. Aren't those big enough corporations? > are they in the bike shed business? I have the feeling that myth and reality also got mixed up in this threat. I better use a hobby operating system that works than a professional operating system that forces users to do what it wants. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140516130747.32753887>