Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:06:31 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it safe to compile multiple ports at the same time ? Message-ID: <368E5487-85F5-4F6B-A5A5-B26532FD410B@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <200605180042.42413.paul.koch@statseeker.com> References: <200605171353.37745.paul.koch@statseeker.com> <20060517060026.GA40653@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <66F2413E-5D81-4BD6-B842-104A449E4753@khera.org> <200605180042.42413.paul.koch@statseeker.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-6--80016686 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On May 17, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Paul Koch wrote: > My original thinking was just a simple locking setup, because I often > setup new machines by doing a release install, cvsup to -stable and > ports, build/install world/kernel, xorg, kde, openoffice, gvim, > browers, etc... and have to do them one at a time instead of firing up > lots of port builds and coming back a few days later :) I keep a local package repo just for this purpose, and a local meta- port to install all those packages in one "pkg_add" command. I have meta ports for each class of server we run (web front end, db server, general server, etc.) No need to build everything on each identical machine... --Apple-Mail-6--80016686--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?368E5487-85F5-4F6B-A5A5-B26532FD410B>