From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 18:15:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A19106564A; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841A58FC2E; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07A8246B8C; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:15:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DEED28A01F; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:15:17 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Alexander Best Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:11:52 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100217; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003111311.52606.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:15:17 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r205013 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:15:19 -0000 On Thursday 11 March 2010 12:01:28 pm Alexander Best wrote: > thanks for the commit. :) > > a few thoughts: > > 1) why does stepping remain to be printed in dec while family and model are in > hex? is this the way amd/intel cpu docs refer to stepping/model/family? I just left it the way it was. > 2) the hex value for "Id" and "(AMD) Features(2)" gets printed with an "0x" > prepended to indicate it's in hex. maybe this should also be the case here. Because on a typical Intel system you overflow 80 cols if you do that. :( Otherwise I would have. We could maybe add an 'h' suffix as that is what the manuals and it would only add 2 chars rather than 4. -- John Baldwin