From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 07:15:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BA616A41F for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:15:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B851243D5C for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:15:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 88929 invoked by uid 399); 5 Dec 2005 07:15:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Dec 2005 07:15:34 -0000 Message-ID: <4393E915.8020302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:15:33 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051203) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <200512031609.48962.nb_root@videotron.ca> <200512041135.39342.nb_root@videotron.ca> <20051204174032.GA1304@mail.scottro.net> <200512041303.45970.nb_root@videotron.ca> <43933227.4050906@FreeBSD.org> <7.0.0.16.2.20051204102647.037622d8@pozo.com> <43933CFB.8060908@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <43933CFB.8060908@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Scott Robbins , Nicolas Blais Subject: Re: [rc update] sshd no longer starts at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:15:38 -0000 Thanks to debugging help from Manfred and Scott, I've decided to give up on trying to figure out what's wrong with the ports scripts. :) Seriously though, Brooks and I have had a conversation about whether the *.sh scripts generally need to be sourced into the shell at all, or can they be run like "regular" rc.d scripts. The problems with the fairly simple stuff that Scott and Manfred had installed (i.e., completely non-obvious, and no good reason for it to fail) convinced me that we need to go this route, at least in the short term. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection