Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 11:09:36 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: ponds!ponds!rivers (Thomas David Rivers) Cc: ponds!lambert.org!terry, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!rivers, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!freefall.cdrom.com!freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: daily panics - the saga continues... Message-ID: <199611151809.LAA26498@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199611150156.UAA20755@lakes.water.net> from "Thomas David Rivers" at Nov 14, 96 08:56:14 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Sounds like a reasonable explanation.... but...
>
> In the 2.1.5R and 2.1.5-STABLE code, there is no call to
> simple_unlock(&vnode_free_list_slock) - in fact, there is no
> simple_unlock() in the entire kern sub-directory...
>
> I think there's some 2.1.5 vs. -current confusion?
Shit. My local machine has BSD4.4-Lite2 integrated... sorry. 8-(.
Which code, exactly, are you running?
> if (freevnodes < (numvnodes >> 2) ||
> numvnodes < desiredvnodes ||
> ! vp == NULL || /* list empty */
> ! vp->v_usecount) /* queue wrapped */
> ! {
For your code, this might need to be:
> if (freevnodes < (numvnodes >> 2) ||
> numvnodes < desiredvnodes ||
> ! vp == NULL || /* list empty */
> ! (vp->v_usecount && vp->v_usage == 0)) /* queue wrapped */
> ! {
Damn, I'm getting old.
Terry Lambert
terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611151809.LAA26498>