From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed May 14 18:17:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA19608
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 14 May 1997 18:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA19601;
          Wed, 14 May 1997 18:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199705150117.SAA19601@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Reply-to addresses
To: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 18:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: jmb@FreeBSD.ORG, p.richards@elsevier.co.uk, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199705142126.RAA21343@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu> from "Joel Ray Holveck" at May 14, 97 05:26:54 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Joel Ray Holveck wrote:
> 
> 
> We reprogram majordomo to recognize that the message had
> "To: joelh@gnu" in the header and not send it to me when it expands
> hackers.  Sure, sendmail has already sent a message to me, but we keep
> majordomo from sending it instead of trying to keep sendmail from
> sending it.
	
	can you send me a context diff for these changes?
> 
> Remind me, why does majordomo expand the aliases itself instead of
> letting sendmail do it with a :include: that majordomo can maintain?
	
	because we use bulk_mailer to speed the delivery process.
	bulk_mailer does the final handoff to sendmail.
jmb