From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jun 1 5:47:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B411F37B745 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 05:47:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Received: from strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk ([192.168.91.36] ident=exim) by scientia.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12xU4q-0003qH-00; Thu, 01 Jun 2000 13:27:56 +0100 Received: (from ben) by strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk (Exim 3.12 #7) id 12xU4q-0003C0-00; Thu, 01 Jun 2000 13:27:56 +0100 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 13:27:56 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst To: James Howard Cc: Shawn Barnhart , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PR ports/17675 Message-ID: <20000601132756.T99925@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <002f01bfcb78$48db5130$0102a8c0@k6> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org James Howard wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2000, Shawn Barnhart wrote: > >> Was there some reason that this didn't get committed and if not could it >> get committed? GNU find is the one thing I really miss from Linux -- I >> find myself doing unholy things with ls and sed in its place.. > > You can add the missing feature(s) to the FreeBSD find(1). I did just that, I sent a patch to -hackers a while back, but it got no response. Either that's good in that there's no objections, or bad in that no-one cares. I think I'll send-pr it now you've reminded me. In fact, I just have send-pr'd it. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message