From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Apr 24 17:01:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA10743
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 17:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (rwwa.com [198.115.177.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA10734
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 17:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (localhost.rwwa.com [127.0.0.1])
	by spooky.rwwa.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA02252
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 20:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199704250001.UAA02252@spooky.rwwa.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Can't put 512MB ram in box ... Extended memory question. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Apr 1997 14:38:53 PDT."
             <199704232138.OAA06172@root.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 20:01:00 -0400
From: Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Can someone tell my why WIN95 can figure out I have 128M in this machine
(with no special help from me) and FreeBSD can't?  I don't like the idea
of WIN95 being smarter than FreeBSD.... ;-)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Withrow, Tel: +1 617 592 8935, Net: witr@rwwa.COM